EMIR Transaction Reporting Q&As Updated

April 18, 2023

ESMA have published a new version of the EMIR transaction reporting Q&A. Please find below a summary of the changes:

Change Subject Status Before After
1 TR Q9) Reporting to TRs: Table of fields Amended Question: (e) If a broker is itself the counterparty (legal principal) to a trade, should it be reported in both the “broker” and “counterparty” fields?

Answer: (e) Yes

Question: (e) If a broker is itself the counterparty (legal principal) to a trade, should it be reported in both the “broker” and “counterparty” fields?

Answer: (e) No, when a broker is a counterparty to a derivative, it should report the derivative and
identify itself as a counterparty. In line with the RTS on reporting and more particularly with regard to
the details to be reported in the field 1.8, the broker is then not required to report its LEI in the field
’Broker ID’.

2 TR Q59) Inclusion of derivatives in the Trade State Report (TSR) New n/a Question: (a) Should the derivatives maturing on day T be included in the TSR for that day?

Answer: (a) Yes, the TRs should ensure that derivatives that mature on a given day should still be included in the TSR for that day. For the avoidance of doubt, the derivatives that were terminated or cancelled on a given day with any of the following action types: ‘E’, ‘C’, ‘P’ or ‘Z’, should not be included in the TSR for that day.

3 TR Q59) Inclusion of derivatives in the Trade State Report (TSR) New n/a Question: (a) Should the counterparty be allowed to ‘reopen’ a derivative by modifying the maturity or termination date to a future date once the derivative expired or was terminated?

Answer: (a) No, it is not possible to change the status of the derivative from non-outstanding to outstanding by modifying the maturity or termination date.

Modification or correction of a maturity date to a future date should be allowed only until the day
following the previously reported maturity date. In the case of modifications or corrections reported
after that day, the new maturity date should be earlier than the date part of the field ‘Reporting
Timestamp’ (Field 1.1).

With regards to the termination date, it cannot be modified nor corrected to a future date once the
derivative was terminated with action type ‘C’, ‘Z’ or ‘P’, therefore. counterparties should use these
action types diligently. In the case of modifications or corrections reported after the submission of
a report with action type ‘C’, ‘Z’ or ‘P’, the new termination date should be earlier than the date part
of the field ‘Reporting Timestamp’ (Field 1.1).

4 ETD Q2) Which parties have to report  Amended Question: Which parties have to report ETD contracts?

Question: Which parties have to report ETD contracts?

 

Control Now Ltd (2017), is a provider of Transaction Reporting software tools to empower market participants to perform oversight of their Regulatory Reporting Processes. Control Now Ltd accepts no liability for any loss or damage caused by use of or reliance on this information or any other information published by Control Now Ltd. Recipients of this information must perform their own due diligence to confirm the information is accurate and relevant for their business scenario. Control Now Ltd reserves its right to re-publish the information.